Can You Tell Me About the Automated Workflows and Procedures in the Software? This tool can look at everyone’s calendars and send an automated email to your inbox every morning outlining where each employee is scheduled to be that day. One particularly powerful feature of SmartAdvocate’s Outlook integration is the “Who Is Where Tomorrow” feature. We also have a client birthday report: Many firms requested this feature to allow attorneys to reach out to clients with a personal touch.
Staff calendars can display events for a single case, individual or event, use preformatted calendar reports, and see items like adjourned and canceled appointments. SmartAdvocate’s Outlook plugin allows for statutes of limitations, critical deadlines, and appointments to be integrated into any of the staff’s Outlook calendars. SmartAdvocate makes it easy to keep all of your communications organized in one place! Does it Also Work With Calendars Like Microsoft Outlook? And when a paralegal gets an email with attachments, they can save them directly to the Documents page through the Outlook plugin. When attorneys send email using Outlook, all of their emails can automatically attach to the appropriate case files within SmartAdvocate. One great feature of SmartAdvocate is that emails can be sent both from SmartAdvocate and from Outlook, so you can use whichever interface you prefer. Can SmartAdvocate Tie In With Email Like Microsoft Outlook? With our help, law firms can increase their overall profitability and efficiency. SmartAdvocate is continually updated to make sure that all of our customers can endure the challenges of today’s fast-paced, highly competitive, and tech-demanding world.
We'd say so - we think it's the only plausible one we've heard so far.ĭisclaimer: Nilay's a lawyer and about to fall over from CES, but he's not your lawyer, and this isn't legal advice or analysis.SmartAdvocate is an incredibly powerful, entirely Web-based, and fully integrated case management system used by a wide range of litigation firms. Update: World Of Apple notes that this argument has been present from the outset, but it sounds like Psystar's really pushing it now. We'll see how Apple responds - things just got interesting again. It's an interesting tactic with a ton of repercussions beyond Apple if it's successful, but we honestly can't see it working - in the cases where first sale has been used to overcome a EULA, it's generally been for used software, not companies like Psystar, who are modifying and installing new copyrighted software sold by a first party.
MAC SOFTWARE FOR LAWYERS LICENSE
Here's the thing though: a big part of Apple's case (but not all of it) is based around the fact that consumers license OS X under the terms of the EULA - and courts are basically up in the air over whether the first sale doctrine should apply to software transactions. That's the first sale doctrine, if you're into copyright law - it states that the purchaser of copyrighted materials (like a book) can sell or dispose of them however they want.
MAC SOFTWARE FOR LAWYERS MAC OS X
So it looks like wannabe cloner Psystar's supposedly hotshot law firm of Carr and Ferrell regrouped for a deep think after pumping out some fairly weak arguments in its case against Apple - according to a new draft of Psystar's countersuit, the Florida-based computer reseller should be allowed to sell whitebox Mac OS X machines because it legally purchased copies of Leopard at retail.
0 kommentar(er)
